TFN Will Be Live-Blogging, Tweeting the Texas SBOE’s Science Textbook Hearing Today

“Any statements made were my own personal beliefs.”

That’s how Karen Beathard, an official state textbook reviewer, defends telling publishers that the biology textbooks they submitted for adoption in Texas this year should include “creation science based on biblical principles.”

Her statement encapsulates precisely the problem with the science textbook adoption process in Texas. Some State Board of Education (SBOE) members decided to nominate reviewers based on their personal beliefs, not their qualifications or expertise. And because they did so, SBOE members have undermined public confidence that the review process was anything but a sham.

Ms. Beathard, a dietician/nutritionist, has every right to her personal beliefs. The Texas Freedom Network will stand up for her right to express those beliefs in public or in private. But Texas students should get a 21st-century education that prepares them for college and the jobs of today. That means their textbooks should be based on established, mainstream science, not the personal beliefs of individuals who simply aren’t qualified to evaluate those textbooks.

Today the State Board of Education will hold its first public hearing on the new science textbooks. TFN Insider will be live-blogging from that meeting. We will also be live-tweeting @TFN_Live.

The hearing is set to begin at 1 p.m. in the board room of the Texas Education Agency. You can also join us at a #StandUp4Science rally at noon outside the TEA building at 17th and Congress in Austin. If you can’t make it to Austin, you can join our virtual #StandUp4Science rally by sharing a photo on social media. Click here for more on how you can participate in our virtual rally.

This article was posted in these categories: creationism, evolution, intelligent design, Science adoption (2013), State Board of Education, TFNEF. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post.Trackbacks are closed, but you can Post a Comment.


-->

2 Comments

  1. Maureen Downs
    Posted September 17, 2013 at 6:42 pm | Permalink

    Religion and “personal opinion” do not belong in science books! Creationism of any type from any religion is not science and therefore does not belong in science books. The fact that I even have to say this enrages me. AND if creationism is taught in science class so then should reincarnation be taught. If one religious belief is science than so is another. Religious beliefs should be taught in comparative religions, science should be taught in science and math taught in math class.

  2. Posted September 17, 2013 at 1:20 pm | Permalink

    What does the #StandUp4Science crowd look like? Not getting any updates here in DFW.

Post a Comment

TFN Insider Comments Policy

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>