Opposing Texas SBOE Candidates Talk Evolution and Science Education

We can’t republish the Waco Tribune-Herald’s full Q-and-A pieces with Texas State Board of Education incumbent Gail Lowe of Lampasas and her challenger in the District 14 Republican primary on May 29, Sue Melton of Waco. (The two articles are behind the Trib’s paywall; links are below.) But we did want to note how the two candidates answered questions about evolution and science education.

Lowe, who is part of the state board’s creationist bloc that worked to dumb down instruction on evolution in new science curriculum standards adopted in 2009, told the Trib’s editorial board that she’s not anti-science:

Q: The most common perception is you’re a dedicated creationist who wants to get more of that belief in public school textbooks and weaken the teaching of evolution in the classroom.

A: I am a person of deep, religious faith. I believe the Bible teaches that we have a creator. But I don’t believe ever at the State Board of Education level any of us ever advocated for the teaching of creation in our materials. I would like a more objective view of what we teach as creation. The complexity of the cell and the world around us is evidence there is an order, that it is not natural processes that got us here, that there is a purpose beyond just random mutations and chance happenstance that got people here.

The science teachers who have testified before us are not the people I want teaching religious concepts. I want them teaching science concepts. But we don’t want to market things like global warming and naturalistic evolution where we sugarcoat it to get you to buy into it when in fact it’s not measurable, not observable, not replicable in a laboratory. That’s not really science.

We’ve gotten into marketing and indoctrination when we attempt those historical evolution discussions that we can’t back with fact. I want the theory of biological evolution taught but I want it taught with a little more circumspection. Students need to know this is not proven, that it is not fact, that there’s no way to recreate the situation that may have existed or to replicate what may have happened to initially start life. I just think we need to do more critical thinking about biological evolution.

Melton, a retired classroom teacher and former president of the Association of Texas Professional Educators, explained her position on the issue:

Q: Most controversy involving the State Board of Education usually revolves around matters of religious belief and how those are to be reflected in textbooks. How would you go about taking a more thoughtful, professional posture in that process rather than what has happened in recent years?

A: I’m a Christian and I believe in the Bible. The Bible tells us who created the earth and why, but science can tell us when and how. I think we have the kids in schools to educate them, not to teach them religious beliefs.

Q: You don’t see any conflict between your biblical Christian beliefs and teaching evolution?

A: No, I don’t see a conflict, but I don’t think our battle over evolution and creationism has a place in the classroom. That needs to be done at home and in the churches. We need to stick to the scientific evidence in the classroom.

This article was posted in these categories: 2012 Texas SBOE elections, evolution, Gail Lowe, science, Sue Melton, TFN. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post.Trackbacks are closed, but you can Post a Comment.


-->

6 Comments

  1. Wayne
    Posted October 29, 2012 at 3:27 pm | Permalink

    In the beginning, GOD created the heavens and earth. One day, ALL will understand this FACT (with way more scientific evidence to prove it than evolution does (since evolution is scientific THEORY, not fact)). Depending on how the evolution “dog doop” is presented in the classroom, I know many who will home school their children and teach them truly objective FACTS about both creationism and evolution!

  2. Will Fraser
    Posted June 4, 2012 at 9:12 pm | Permalink

    As an oil and gas geologist I tried on multiple occasions to engage Lowe via email such that she might consider actual geology rather than the creationist dog doop she loved to expound upon at SBOE. Of course, any suggestion that she was spouting creationist gibberish
    was ignored and only strengthened her faith that by ignoring the actual science and repeating incredibly ignorant creationist fraud masquerading as science, she was somehow serving God and mankind. I am stunned that someone who managed to crawl through whatever courses of study she undertook at LSU and who knows where else could have not somehow absorbed the ability to examine evidence and reach logical conclusions. GAIL you don’t speak for me as a Chrisitian, nor do you speak for most Christian denominations.
    Endlessly repeating the same fraudulent non scientific sewerage is not going to make it so. Poly strafe fossils and Noah’s flood? At Liberty “U” maybe but not in the real world sweetie. Creation science is a science stopper, and so were you. Or to phrase it more delicately, creationistms impact on science, and mankind has been no different than astrology’s. Get help. Barring that, read a few actual science textbooks. Sad.

  3. Coragyps
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 2:12 pm | Permalink

    And Ms. Lowe has a handle on how to replicate conditions that allow dust + breath to initially start life? Will she share that knowledge with the rest of us?

  4. abb3w
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    I’d note that despite the paywall, the full text of the interviews are available at the two links if you look at the raw HTML source code for the two pages. Sloppy coding, that.

    However, TFN has excerpted the really meaty seeming bits.

    Looks like Melton falls in the Slightly Silly Party to Slightly Sensible Party range at this point.

  5. Ray Gedaly
    Posted April 11, 2012 at 11:11 am | Permalink

    Apparently Gail Lowe is what you get when you dumb down the teaching of science in public schools. Thankfully, natural selection should eventually weed out the Gail Lowes. :)

  6. Ben
    Posted April 10, 2012 at 3:00 pm | Permalink

    Two things:

    1. Glad Sue finally came out with a firm opinion.

    2. Gail Lowe is apparently too ignorant to understand that the theory of evolution does not address “what may have happened to initially start life.” She offers a lot of uninformed idiocy, lovingly wrapped in lies.

    Sue appears to be much more honest than Gail.

Post a Comment

TFN Insider Comments Policy

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>