Coordinated Anti-Mormonism?

Mormonism, or the attacks on it, is in the news again this morning following a story in The Daily Beast that cites emails between a Christian radio executive and well-known religious-right activist David Lane.

The emails between Lane and Dick Bott of the Bott Radio Network seem to indicate the two were in cahoots to advance the anti-Mormon narrative that became controversial when Dallas pastor and Gov. Rick Perry supporter Robert Jeffress called the faith of Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney a cult and non-Christian.

The story posits that because Lane a long history as an important Gov. Perry supporter, perhaps the coordinated efforts were not between Lane and Bott alone, but also with Gov. Perry’s presidential campaign.

We’re not quite ready to take that leap. As Sarah Posner points out in another story published today in Religion Dispatches, the evidence for coordination between Gov. Perry’s campaign and Lane on this issue is thin right now. But there are other reasons to be distressed by these emails.

Gov. Perry and Lane have been close associates for a long time. Lane is one of the organizers of the Texas Restoration Project, established to mobilize conservative pastors for political purposes. The group has periodically organized “pastors’ briefings” that feature Gov. Perry (six alone in 2005, just before the governor 2006 re-election campaign). Lane was also an organizer for The Response, Gov. Perry’s Aug. 6 prayer rally in Houston.

So Lane’s political tactics and divisive words reflect on the governor. Consider, for example, this excerpt from a Lane email:

“Thank you for what you are doing and for your leadership. Getting out Dr. Jeffress [sic] message, juxtaposing traditional Christianity to the false god of Mormonism, is very important in the larger scheme of things.”

We’ve been clear that faith should not be used as a political weapon. But that is exactly what Lane — who believes only conservative evangelical Christians (by his definition) like Gov. Perry should occupy the White House — is doing. Gov. Perry should publicly reject Lane’s tactics and repudiate his vicious and divisive words. He should do so not because some believe his campaign might have coordinated this attack with Lane.  And maybe not just because Gov. Perry and Lane are close associates. He should do so simply because it’s the right thing to do.

This article was posted in these categories: 2012 Elections, David Lane, religious right, Rick Perry. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post. Post a Comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


-->

3 Comments

  1. Hartmut
    Posted October 23, 2011 at 5:04 am | Permalink

    Gordon, don’t forget the Bahá’í Faith. To my knowledge it is the only religion that claims to be just a transition until the next upgrade arrives. As I understand it the Bahai believe that the sequence of religions is the intention of the divine that will send new revelations to mankind once it reaches the next level of maturity. So one day even their faith will become obsolete and be replaced with something more advanced and better. I assume this is one reason why they are persecuted. Not only do they question the older models, they refuse to declare themselves to possess the final truth (what one would expect from a ‘proper’ religion).
    No, I am not a Bahai follower trying to recruit anyone ;-) I am agnostic verging on atheist.

  2. Posted October 18, 2011 at 3:52 pm | Permalink

    Jesus is the False God of Mormonism? That fits. Jesus is the sixth of seven prophets of Islam. This persistent use of Jesus of three of the four religions based on the teachings of Abraham surely confuseth the faithful. It seems symple to me that each successive prophet establishes an upgrade to the former, the MS DOS being replaced by Windows, Millenilum Edition by XP (Me), and by Vista.

    Of course, some of the upgrades may have some bugs not quite worked out.

  3. Margaret D. Blough
    Posted October 17, 2011 at 10:26 pm | Permalink

    I find it ironic that these, people who claim to be Constitutional fundamentalists/literalists advocate a violation of what, in fact was the Framers, only reference to religion in the original, pre-amendment Constitution: Article VI’s ban on religious tests for public office.

Post a Comment

TFN Insider Comments Policy

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>