Live Blogging the Final Social Studies Vote

9:43 – The Texas State Board of Education is set today to take a final vote on proposed new social studies curriculum standards for public schools. The board first has to finish its debate over proposed amendments to the standards. We expect that debate will resume later this morning. We expect one of the key debates today will be over what students learn about separation of church and state. Stay tuned.

11:10 – The board has resumed debate on the standards, taking up the high school world history standards first.

11:11 – Pat Hardy wants to change a world history standard dealing with the period 1450-1750, added in March, that would have students study “pro-free market factors that contributed to Europe’s Commercial Revolution.” Hardy wants to the standard simply to say “new economic factors,” with some board members noting that the concept of free markets was very different at that period. The proposal passes. The board’s far-right members don’t like it.

11:14 – Hardy wants to change “explain the benefits of free enterprise in the Industrial Revolution.” She wants the standard simply to say “effects of free enterprise,” noting that there were good and bad effects. Her goal, she says, is to remove “value-laden language” so that students can understand different sides of issues. The proposal passes. Far-right board members oppose.

11:35 – A string of largely non-controversial amendments — mostly tedious arguments about the relative merits of name after name after name…

11:38 – Here’s an interesting footnote for the history books — Don McLeroy just made a passionate argument for the addition of Alan Turing to the world history standards. One wonders if McLeroy realizes that just last fall the British Government offered a posthumous apology to Alan Turing for prosecuting him as a homosexual. No matter. McLeroy’s surprising attempt to “advance the gay agenda” is stymied when the amendment fails. (h/t Abby Rapoport)

11:52 – Take a moment to check out the video post we just put up with Cynthia Dunbar’s divisive prayer that started today’s board meeting.

12:08 – In a rambling debate over whether the world history standards should reference the “benefits” or “effects” of the free enterprise system, far-right members make the absurd argument that textbooks have historically ignored the benefits of the free enterprise system — or even more strangely, that using the word “effects” somehow paints communism is an beneficial light! “Benefits” wins the day, unsurprisingly.

12:22 – Rene Nunez moves to reinstate Oscar Romero to the world history standards. The board voted to disappear the martyred Salvadoran bishop in March when far right members stated on the record they simply did not know who Romero was.

12:26 — Romero unanimously added back. Far-right members offer no apologies for their earlier ignorance.

12:28 – Dunbar asks for a brand new world history standard to recognize William Wilberforce, a prominent British abolitionist. Amendment passes.

12:31 – Here we go. Bob Craig makes a motion to add “impact of Enlightenment ideas” back into a standard altered in March to remove references to the Enlightenment and Thomas Jefferson. Craig also asks to strike the Protestant theologian John Calvin (added in March) and restoring Thomas Jefferson. Far-right board members pounce.

12:36 – Dunbar rides to the defense of John Calvin, trying desperately to recast him as a political theorist on the order of others mentioned in the standards.

12:39 – Miller defends the absolute necessity of keeping Jefferson, reading comments from SMU history professor Ed Countryman. Board members are taken aback at sudden injection of informed opinion into their debate.

12:42 – It appears the far right is set to wave the white flag and allow Jefferson back into this standard. But they are dead set on having Aquinas and Calvin alongside him in this standard.

12:44 – Here is Dunbar’s tortured logic — the definition of Enlightenment necessarily rules out divine, received knowledge in favor of rational knowledge. Ergo, you can’t put political philosophers like Montesquieu and Blackstone in a standard mentioning Enlightenment thinking because they believed knowledge was received from God.

12:50 – Motion fails on a 7-8 vote. Pat Hardy added the eighth vote to the far-right bloc.

12:52 – Mercer immediately follows with a motion to add Thomas Jefferson and James Madison to the same standard. Pat Hardy makes an amendment to strike Madison and keep Jefferson in Mercer’s amendment.

1:04 – Hardy’s amendment to strike Madison passes 8-7. They now return to original motion as amended. It passes without objection. Welcome back, Tommy!

1:07 – Craig taking another run at reworking the troublesome standard. He proposes changing the wording to “Explain the political philosophy of individuals such as…” followed by same long list of names including Jefferson, Calvin, Aquinas, et al. Heated debate follows.

1:34 – Craig’s amendment passed a few moments ago.

2:05 – Board takes up amendments to geography standards.

2:15 – And at long last, we come to the US government standards. Let the fireworks commence.

2:16 – Bob Craig offers extensive and lengthy rewrite of the contentious church-state amendment. It is an attempt at compromise, but contains the phrase “compare and contrast” language of First Amendment with “separation of church and state.” Needless to say, we don’t see this as a compromise — implying that the First Amendment is somehow antithetical to the separation of church and state is just what the far right wants.

2:18 – Mavis Knight immediately offers an amendment striking “compare and contrast” and adding back in the language that failed in March about government being barred from promoting or disfavoring one faith over others. Her amendment fails 10-5 on a straight party line vote.

2:24 – Craig’s original amendment passes 11-3. So the standard now says “Examine the reasons the Founding Fathers protected religious freedom in America and guaranteed it free exercise by saying that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, and compare and contrast this to the phrase ‘separation of church and state’.”

2:27 – Craig offers another amendment deleting the term “constitutional republic” and inserting “democratic society” throughout the government standards. Motion fails on a show of hands.

Good luck to Texas students who will first encounter the idea of American democracy when they get to their first college class.

2:32 – Mary Helen Berlanga makes a motion to add American GI Forum to a list of political interest groups in the government standards — and to add the phrase “established due to discrimination of Hispanics” after LULAC in the same standard. Amendment fails 7-8 with Hardy providing the eighth vote to the far-right bloc.

2:41 – We’re on to sociology, so things should settle down now, right? Wrong. An amendment on sexuality and gender right out of the box.

Mavis Knight proposes restoring a standard deleted by the board in March about differentiating between sex and gender. (Knight’s amendment changes the wording slightly from the original.) Cargill repeats her paranoia that teachers will have to talk about “transvestites, transsexuals, etc., etc.” (Gasp!) Board conservatives apparently made up their minds to kill this one when they heard the word “sex.” Knight and Allen pushing for the necessity of this standard.

2:53 – Amendment fails, but provides a little preview of the health curriculum debate in a couple of years.

3:03 – In one last swipe at ethnic minorities, Cargill offers an amendment watering down the sociology standards presentation of racism. The existing standard said: “Explain how institutional racism is evident in American society.” After amendment adopted 9-5 on a party-line vote, the standard now reads “discuss instances of institutional racism in American society.” (new language based on board discussion — we will confirm when we see copy of actual amendment)

3:15 – Board working on some minor clean-up items in early grades (though even this can’t be done without lengthy bickering).

3:53 – The board is about to vote on final standards for social studies courses except economics, which will be considered separately (because of the way they are listed in official rules).

3:55 – Board members are offering their final comments on the standards. First up is Mary Helen Berlanga. Berlanga believes that the standards cover up too much of the problems the nation has faced, especially the challenges faced by minorities. When Texas kids get to college, she says, they will finally get a chance to learn real history. She announces her opposition to the proposed standards.

4:02 – Mavis also opposes adoption of the new standards. She criticizes the length and politicization of the standards. Knight also decries the rush to approve the documents rather than making sure the standards are appropriate. “I am ashamed of what we have done to the teachers and the children of this state. I will not vote for this version or any other version of this travesty.”

4:06 – Rick Agosto criticizes how the board has “perverted” the process by rewriting the detailed work of curriculum teams. “I don’t know what this thing [the standards document] is. This thing belongs in the trash!” Frankly, we wish we had seen more of this side of Agosto over the past four years. Over the past year, it’s become clear that even he has become disgusted by the way the board has turned the revision of curriculum standards into opportunities to promote personal and political agendas.

4:13 – Lawrence Allen joins in opposition to the standards and begins by apologizing to Chairwoman Gail Lowe that he isn’t qualified to set curriculum standards. “Sometimes I think I must be the dumb one at the table. Other folks here seem to think they know everything.” “I don’t think we should sit here and think we have the capability to write standards.” There’s a difference, he says, between writing standards and approving standards. Other board members have good intentions, he says: “I just think they don’t know what they’re doing.” He calls on the standards to be vetted by experts and those who will implement those standards in the schools: “If the standards are off course, then the instruction will be off course.”

4:19 – Allen moves to delay final approval by the standards until the July board meeting. Bob Craig says he was going to make a similar motion. He notes that the curriculum writers for the high school American history course have announced their opposition to the revised standards. He wants experts to review the standards as revised by the board.

4:30 – Cargil: “I am proud to have my name on this document, and I am against postponement.”

Leo: “The entire nation has vetted this curriculum…Please consider that we have put in more minorities than ever before…I don’t see what postponing would do.”

Mercer: “It sounds rational for the cameras…” but the legislature wants us to wait until January when a new board is seated. So vote now.

Bradley: “Texas changed [politically since the last social studies adoption]! This is a political process. Absent that, go find yourself a political dictator and he can tell you what to do.”

Hardy: “I still have a number of concerns about certain aspects of this document. And I’m still considering.”

4:37 – Commissioner Scott: “Waiting until July is not an excessive administrative delay…” But he doesn’t think anything will change in 60 days.

Dunbar: “I feel we have done due diligence and there is no reason for delay.”

Knight: “At the end of the day, if it’s not a quality document, it’s my responsibility to reject it.”

Craig: “I am not fearful of having somebody review the document we worked on.”

Agosto: “We’re rewriting history. We’re rewriting it the way we think it should be.”

4:46 – The motion to postpone adoption fails 6-8, with all five Democrats joined by Craig voting to postpone. Hardy joined the board’s far-right faction to oppose postponement. Geraldine “Tincy” Miller is absent.

5:00 – Oh, cry me a river. Ken Mercer is claiming people have been attacking him for being a conservative. This is the guy who has questioned the faith of people who disagree with him.

5:02 – And now Mercer is comparing his critics to the notorious Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels. Wow. Just wow.

5:06 – The board votes 9-5 to adopt the high school social studies standards. All Republicans vote yes (except Tincy Miller, who is absent), and all Democrats oppose. The board will next consider the elementary and middle school standards.

5:20 – The board rejects a proposal from Rick Agosto to strike a requirement in eighth-grade American history that students contrast the ideas in Jefferson Davis’s inaugural address with the speeches of President Lincoln. Never mind that Davis’s address said nothing about slavery, the core cause of the Civil War, and focus mostly on attacking federal authority. TEA Partiers have a new historical champion, apparently: Jefferson Davis.

5:23 – On another 9-5 party-line vote, the board approves the middle school and elementary school social studies standards.

5:26 – The board is now finishing debate on high school economics, the only standards left for adoption.

5:33 – The board votes 14-0 (Tincy Miller is absent) to adopt the economics standards. Those standards have attracted far less controversy than the other social studies standards.

5:40 – Thanks for joining us for the live-blogging over the last three days. So we’ll sign off with TFN President Kathy Miller’s e-mail this evening to TFN supporters:

Moments ago the State Board of Education cast the final vote on new social studies standards, ending more than a year of political wrangling that invited derision and scorn from the entire educational world. I’m not going to take you through the litany of problems with this curriculum. You can read about those on our blog or in the hundreds of news stories that will appear in the media tomorrow. All of these issues, as serious as they are, are really symptoms of the larger problem — allowing politicians with personal agendas to write our children’s curriculum, rather than teachers and scholars.

That’s why today’s vote is not the end of this fight. It’s the beginning.

For 15 years, all of us at TFN have been committed to safeguarding our children’s education from political ideology. And we’re not about to let up now.

Please make a generous contribution to our efforts today.

Our ultimate goal is nothing less than fundamental change at the State Board of Education. Parents, business leaders and concerned citizens across Texas must join together in our Just Educate campaign to send a clear message to politicians: stop dragging our children’s schools into the “culture wars.” That’s why TFN is mounting our largest grassroots mobilization effort in the history of the organization. And we are counting on you to take part.

TFN’s strategy is ambitious and aggressive — and you can be sure that far-right pressure groups will continue to shell out millions of dollars to hold on to their power. That’s why we’re asking you for the most generous gift you can make today.

Together, we can do it. Our kids deserve better. Our future depends on it.

With gratitude,

Kathy

This article was posted in these categories: live blog, social studies. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post. Post a Comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


-->

38 Comments

  1. A Watcher
    Posted May 25, 2010 at 3:56 pm | Permalink

    I’m sad to say that Texas may be economically hurt by this.

  2. Cytocop CT(ASCP)
    Posted May 24, 2010 at 7:37 pm | Permalink

    @ Mike: No, I believe it is Don McLeroy who is the dentist.

  3. Mike
    Posted May 22, 2010 at 4:08 pm | Permalink

    Agreed. Isnt Dumbar a Dentist? or something

  4. Posted May 22, 2010 at 12:00 pm | Permalink

    The real outcome of this charade is in the implementation. Textbook authors can take the gobbledegook that Little Lord McLeroy inserted in the requirements about contrasting the first ammendment and “separation of church and state” and turn it into a rock solid case for the United States Constitution establishing a secular government. Support TFN and the rational TSBOE candidates. One to convince the textbook writers not to cave into stupid demands and two to have a majority of rational people on the board when the textbooks are approved in the next year or so. Make sure the lame ducks McLeroy and Dunbar don’t get away with their dog in the manger tactics.

  5. Posted May 22, 2010 at 10:58 am | Permalink

    Does anyone know where we can see the document showing the final wording of all the amendments?

    It will be posted in a couple weeks, probably.

    I expect TFN will post the URL when they are there.

    I pity the teachers who will be required to teach to these TEKS; and more than that, I pity their students.

  6. Anonymous
    Posted May 22, 2010 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Does anyone know where we can see the document showing the final wording of all the amendments?

  7. Mike
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 6:01 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the Updates tony. =-) Didnt know ya existed till you got listed in PFAW Right wing Watch, the otherday

  8. Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:32 pm | Permalink

    Ryan and Dan,

    I’m sure you noticed that the NCSS VP spoke Wed., but on behalf of herself, not NCSS.

  9. Mike
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    With all due respect Maybe we should just turn our public schools into like the british. The Stupid people can go to their stupid religifying school while those who want a real chance at life can goto schools sponsored by the major universisites. Maybe its time we let the Major Universities take a crack at leading the Education system at the lowest levels. May not be practical but its alot better than a Dentist telling me what my kid has to know about John Calvin.

  10. Sarah
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:30 pm | Permalink

    I for one am really upset that after all that Craig still didn’t have it in him to stand up to the party line and vote against standards. He made some decent ammendments today, and even voted to postpone, so why not go all the way?

  11. Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    On the Ed Show (MSNBC), SMU’s David Chard has just compared the TX Board’s action with what the Apartheid regime tried to do with curriculum in South Africa as they became increasingly desperate toward the end of their regime.

    It had occurred to me that the issue of “republic” v. “democracy” might have something to do with anxiety over demographic trends in Texas.

    • Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:29 pm | Permalink

      Thanks for the television updates, Tony. Keep ‘em coming. We’re still grinding away in the hearing room.

  12. Mike
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Hooray. Texas can get stupider and Ohio can look better. =-) They keep this up they wont have anyone eligable to hold a seat in congress. They will make our Kids too stupid to be future leaders.

  13. Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:09 pm | Permalink

    I have not heard or seen anybody claim that SBOE had “completely” cut TJ from the standards.

    If Mercer is lying about this, he needs to be called out on it. I hope somebody will review the the 5 big newspapers he’s referring to. If they did all specify that TJ was cut from the Enlightenment standard (and not from the TEKS completely), then Mercer needs to be exposed as the liar here — as loudly and as prominently as possible.

    Maybe a joint editorial by all 5 papers together, with a link to the video by TFN.

  14. EW01
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    I’m so sorry, guys. You fought so hard.

  15. B Cook
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 4:55 pm | Permalink

    As a Christian teacher of 8th grade history… wow. This system has failed us… I though we had put this behind us when the Daughters of the Confederacy lost their heavy handed influence on education. I guess the New South Shall Rise Again…

    Lord… truly help us all.

  16. Posted May 21, 2010 at 4:02 pm | Permalink

    Chris Mathews has a segment coming up in the next hour on the “Texas Schoolbook Massacre”

  17. Posted May 21, 2010 at 3:41 pm | Permalink

    With Miller absent, Knight’s Venona papers amendment was rejected 9-5 on party lines.

  18. Posted May 21, 2010 at 3:03 pm | Permalink

    On Knight’s amendment to the “personal responsibility” TEK, Lowe broke from the bloc, and Miller joined the bloc (which lost by 7-8).

  19. Jonesy
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:51 pm | Permalink

    This is just awful..only in Texas, OK, maybe Kentucky..would you have semi-literate, quasi political figures writing textbooks. These folks are neither historians, teachers, researchers, academics, …Pls post these stories to your facebook, twitter account, email your local newspaper, etc, etc. The goons have to be denounced and sent back home in shame and to hide under the rock they came from…

  20. Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:47 pm | Permalink

    Lorenzo Sadun Says:

    What’s with Pat Hardy? She’s usually a very reasonable person, but on a number of key issues she has marched lockstep with the bad guys.

    I lost any respect for her integrity on this when she argued (in January, I think) against including Thomas Paine in U.S. History because there are some things about him that she does not approve of.

  21. cathyd
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:45 pm | Permalink

    Pat is having to compromise and play nicely with them so they don’t block every important change she wants to make. She is making necessary moves to salvage the most important areas. If she doesn’t, they will shut her down like they always have.
    Pat has worked very hard to do the very best for kids. Unfortunately compromise is reality.

  22. Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:42 pm | Permalink

    Amendment fails 7-8 with Hardy providing the eighth vote to the far-right bloc.

    Actually, Mercer broke ranks from the bloc, with Hardy and Miller both voting with the bloc.

  23. Lorenzo Sadun
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:34 pm | Permalink

    What’s with Pat Hardy? She’s usually a very reasonable person, but on a number of key issues she has marched lockstep with the bad guys.

  24. Vickie
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:28 pm | Permalink

    It is the people like those on this Texas School Board who make the rest of us, you know the rational people, ashamed to be Americans. If they want a Christian nation then start a political party devoted to that and vote for that instead of trying to back door it by rewriting history.

    I’m really not that bothered by their ignorance, I’m more bothered by the fact that they think the rest of us are so ignorant that we won’t realize what they’re doing. Guess what, we’re not.

  25. FreedomFighter
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:27 pm | Permalink

    Keep fighting the good fight TFN! I’m sending you a donation right now.

  26. EW01
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:15 pm | Permalink

    Keep it up, TFN! FYI the NAACP has a terrific “not in our state” petition going on. Spread the word to your friends outside TX:
    http://action.naacp.org/TX-textbooks

  27. Posted May 21, 2010 at 2:04 pm | Permalink

    Here’s the list from March, which I think is what they ended up with: John Locke, Thomas Hobbes, Voltaire, Charles de Montesquieu, Jean Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Aquinas, John Calvin, and William Blackstone and Thomas Jefferson.

    Was there an amendment passed saying students should be working from the original texts by these writers?

  28. Posted May 21, 2010 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    Would it be possible to post the language of the TEK on political philosophy, or at least a list of all the names?

    BTW, I love that stuff. In fact, I audited that course two times as an undergraduate: taught one year by Michael Walzer, and another year by Harvey Mansfield, Jr.

    Both time it was a full, semester-long course. I don’t know how much time they’ll have for this in the TX High School course, or the level of understanding that they’ll be able to test for after that length of study.

  29. Mike P
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:40 pm | Permalink

    “Calvin is virtually the founder of America.” Some scholar of political theory has seriously advocated that stance?

  30. Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:33 pm | Permalink

    12:26 — Romero unanimously added back. Far-right members offer no apologies for their earlier ignorance.

    I think it was Mercer who said in March that there’s not even a movie about Romero (despite the movie titled Romero, staring Raul Julia. See
    http://curricublog.wordpress.com/2010/03/23/romeros-murder/

    • Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:55 pm | Permalink

      Good memory, Tony. But I’m pretty sure it was Bradley.

  31. Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:26 pm | Permalink

    A few minutes before the vote on effects/benefits, Allen argued very clearly that SBOE members do not know how to write curriculum, and that’s not what they should be doing.

    A request for TFN: Would you consider posting a video of that?

  32. Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:19 pm | Permalink

    Vote on changing “benefits” to “effects” of the free enterprise system:

    For “effects”: Allen, Craig, Hardy, Knight, Miller

    For “benefits”: bloc of 7, plus Berlanga & Nunez

    Abstain: Agosto

  33. Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:01 pm | Permalink

    One wonders if McLeroy realizes that just last fall the British Government offered a posthumous apology to Alan Turing for prosecuting him as a homosexual

    A computer science student testified Wednesday in favor of adding Turing, and his testimony did include the prosecution for homosexuality.

  34. Mike P
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 11:55 am | Permalink

    11:57 — Is there really an objection to specifying “The Wealth of Nations” be studied when studying Adam Smith? What other book(s) would likely be studied in conjunction with Smith? I don’t understand the grounds for objecting, and certainly don’t see the focus on “The Wealth of Nations” as some burdensome requirement — this is (or ought to be) common cultural literacy.

  35. Travis
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 11:53 am | Permalink

    Of course he wouldn’t….we would have found our way around Nazi encryption at some point in history….these people are a huge joke and an embarrassment.

  36. Mike P
    Posted May 21, 2010 at 11:37 am | Permalink

    11:39 — Ms. Hardy and Ms. Leo aren’t sure Alan Turing will stand the test of time? Really?

Post a Comment

TFN Insider Comments Policy

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>