Live-Blogging the May Social Studies Debate

A live video webcast of the Texas State Board of Education debate over proposed new social studies curriculum standards is available here.

9:30 – The State Board of Education is about to begin debate on the proposed social studies curriculum standards. Education Commissioner Robert Scott, an appointee of Republican Gov. Rick Perry, just launched into an attack on the board’s critics. He encouraged the board to dismiss critics and push ahead with the standards. The commissioner also suggested that the board should be careful about delaying final approve of the social studies standards. But why? The board on Tuesday delayed indefinitely a decision to adopt new science textbooks, something originally scheduled for next year. That pushes the adoption of social studies textbooks — which will be based on the new standards — out even further. There’s plenty of time for the board to let teachers and scholars review the scores of changes board members made to the standards in January and March (in addition to those changes that they will make today). These standards will be in place for the next decade. Isn’t it more important to get this right than insist on meeting what is now an unnecessary deadline of final approval tomorrow?

9:49 – The board is working through technical corrections to the standards and revisions from January and March.

10: 40 – The board has finally started the amendment process — beginning with Kindergarten and marching up through each grade level.

10:54 – Board member Pat Hardy has decided to resume tilting windmills, begging her fellow board members to remove just a few of the long list of names the board added to the standards over the last two hearings. She requests that Nathan Hale be removed from the first grade standards after hearing from elementary teachers that Hale’s death-by-hanging is not appropriate for six-year olds. (Hale remains in the fifth grade standards.) Board conservatives — led by Teri Leo — play the patriot card and insist waiting until fifth grade is outrageous. Amendment passes 8-7 with all the social conservatives voting against.

11:06 – David Bradley asks that all amendments be presented in writing. We agree with Mr. Bradley. This would be a great rule for the board to adopt. Would he also support a rule requiring members to present amendments in advance so board members and the public have time to vet them carefully?

12:10 – Consideration of amendments proceeds apace — mostly minor, uncontroversial changes to elementary TEKS.

12:13 – Mary Helen Berlanga offers an amendment returning Delores Huerta — cofounder of United Farm Workers of America — to a list of good citizens in the third grade standards. (Huerta was originally included in the standards here, but the board removed her name in January when social conservatives alleged that she was a socialist and therefore not an appropriate role model for students.)

Berlanga and her colleagues are mounting a passionate defense of Huerta’s historical significance and worthiness to be included in this standard on citizenship. Ken Mercer’s reply — she’s still a socialist.

12:29 – Amendment fails on a 6-9 vote. So Dolores Huerta still does not qualify as a good citizen according to the Texas SBOE’s standards.

This article was posted in these categories: live blog, social studies. Bookmark the permalink. Follow comments with the RSS feed for this post. Post a Comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


-->

12 Comments

  1. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    They spent 1:40 on 3rd grade.

    At that rate, they have another 15 hours to go.

  2. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:34 pm | Permalink

    The tech staff cut the feed before Lowe said when they’re going to resume.

    TFN: can you post the time for that?

  3. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:19 pm | Permalink

    Since they’re still on 3rd grade, I don’t think the Committee of the Full Board can report out in time for tomorrow.

  4. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    6 for Huerta: Berlanga, Nuñez, Agosto, Knight, Allen, and I think Craig (Hardy was against)

  5. Posted May 20, 2010 at 1:17 pm | Permalink

    The breakdown on the Dolores Huerta vote: the gang-of-7 (Bradley, Cargill, Mercer, McLeroy, Lowe, Dunbar, and Leo) plus Pat Hardy and Geraldine Miller voted against including Huerta in Grade 3. Craig, Agosto, Allen, Berlanga, Knight and Nunez voted for including Huerta.

  6. Posted May 20, 2010 at 12:59 pm | Permalink

    12:29 – Amendment fails on a 6-9 vote. So Dolores Huerta still does not qualify as a good citizen according to the Texas SBOE’s standards.

    But Helen Keller’s still there. Bradley’s rationale: The only good socialist is a dead socialist (maybe also one who’s Anglo, deaf, and dumb).

  7. Mikey
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 12:57 pm | Permalink

    What was the member breakdown on the Huerta vote?

  8. brushycreekpost
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Did people on the list get a second chance to testify today? Is the process currently going on also open for the public to hear?

    • Posted May 20, 2010 at 12:09 pm | Permalink

      The board is not hearing any public testimony today. It is only considering amendments to the curriculum standards offered by board members.

  9. Martha Griffin
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 11:43 am | Permalink

    Miller’s “poor us, we’ve worked so hard” chip on her shoulder was just one example of the epidemic shoulder disease yesterday with the Board. Over and over again, the social conservatives whined publicly about the media and t-shirts and testifiers and the emails they’ve received . . . soooo many people are apparently not giving these hard working members the praise the deserve for putting time into doing the job they were elected to do. On top of that, the public, whom they serve, dares to criticize!

  10. Brian Rutledge
    Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:13 am | Permalink

    When your always completely in the right and have mastered all knowledge, why should they delay ?

  11. Posted May 20, 2010 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    The reasons presented Wed for delaying the final vote were so compelling that I thought the Board might support delay. This morning, however, Miller told Scott that the Board members were angered by proposals for delay. She seemed to take it personally as disparaging the work that they’ve been doing.

    Miller’s stance tells me that there won’t be majority support for a delay.

Post a Comment

TFN Insider Comments Policy

Your email is kept private. Required fields are marked *

*
*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>