Comments on: Rehabilitating Joseph McCarthy?

By: TFN

TFN — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:56:51 +0000

Anonymous,
Unfortunately for you, the very post you’re commenting about quotes the leading scholar on the Venona papers as saying McCarthy wasn’t, in fact, “spot on.”

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:02:38 +0000

I’ve read much of the Venona document releases. McCarthy was spot on.
Can the extreme left (all belonging to the democrat party) explain why they did not want these documents released?
I found it interesting that all the Soviet spys that were (INDEED) in our US government as Congressmen and senators were ALL members of the democratic party. Interesting???
Kind of sheds new light on watergate—Doesn’t it?

By: kittykittybopperwhopper

kittykittybopperwhopper — Sun, 04 Jul 2010 17:12:18 +0000

OK, frank, when you retire, I want to see you turn down Social Security payments.

By: frank

frank — Sun, 30 May 2010 12:42:53 +0000

Read Ch. 10 of the USSR Constitution (the uninformed would insist that this the US Const.). Then read the Humanist Manifestos (Thomas Sowell writes that the religion of secular humanism – now the “established religion” in the US – was spawned by Marxism and serves as the basis of communism) and compare with the DFL party platform and the language of the Social Security Act, and you will find word for word similarities. They are identical. Now read the Program for the Comunist Party USA and see the blueprint for the communist takeover of the USA. Anyone with a SS # is a card carrying commmunist – that is how we “signed up” for it, that is the ugly truth of the matter. McCarthy was right, we are all communists now, we just don’t know it yet.

The USSR Constitution states 57 times that the USSR is a “socialist” (not communist) society. Only twice does the word “communist” appear in the USSR Constitution, both times refering to a member of a political party that “exists to serve as the vanguard of the working people to develop and strengthen the “socialist” system.” They are called DEMOCRATS here. Go figure.

By: trog69

trog69 — Sun, 01 Nov 2009 01:59:06 +0000

Joe, I agree, and the fact is, the social conservatives are the few voters that can be counted on in off-year elections.

By: George

George — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:43:32 +0000

Vindicated? What about Owen Lattimore?

By: Cytocop

Cytocop — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:22:22 +0000

Judging by the letters to the editor I read in the San Antonio Express-News, I’d say most Texans are very pleased with the current SBOE and are supporting card-carrying members of the TX GOP. Most of the editorials are of a similar point of view.

By: Joe

Joe — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:40:10 +0000

A majority of people who voted in those down-ballot races may still think the SBOE members they voted for are doing just fine. I wonder, though, as more people who voted straight-party ballots have learned who they actually put on the SBOE, just how satisfied they really are.

And, more important, voter turnout is not very high in elections other than primaries and generals in presidential years, and roughly half the SBOE is elected in those years. Also, voter turnout often tapers off down the ballot even with presidential races at the top. So the numbers who voted for the current SBOE members most likely do not constitute a majority of all Texans, or even all Texans of voting age, in any of those races. Might be worth checking the election returns for them on the Texas secretary of state’s Web site, http://www.sos.state.tx.us.

By: Country Tom

Country Tom — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:36:34 +0000

How tragic is it that thousand of people voted for the demagogues on the SBOE. Remember a majority of Texans think they are doing just fine!!!!

By: Ben

Ben — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:53:43 +0000

Been here all along, just not saying much. But occasionally McLeroy and his pals say something so stupid, I can’t help noting it.